Hazan and you can Shaver (1987) arranged a straightforward questionnaire to measure these individual differences. (This type of personal differences usually are referred to as connection styles, connection activities, accessory orientations, or variations in the organization of your own connection program.) Basically, Hazan and you will Razor asked lookup sufferers to learn the 3 sentences here, and mean and therefore section best distinguisheded how they think, getting, and you will behave for the romantic dating:
A great. I’m a bit embarrassing getting near to anybody else; I’ve found it difficult to think him or her completely, hard to enable it to be myself to depend on her or him. I’m scared when individuals will get as well close, and often, someone else want me to be much more sexual than simply Personally i think comfy becoming.
B. I’ve found it relatively simple to get next to others and are safe based on her or him and having him or her count on me. I do not value getting quit or about anybody delivering too near to myself.
C. I find you to definitely anyone else are reluctant to score as near while the I want. I commonly care and attention one to my wife does not prefer me personally otherwise would not need certainly to stay with me. I would like to score really alongside my partner, hence both frightens anyone away.
Centered on it about three-classification size, Hazan and you will Razor discovered that the fresh new delivery from groups try similar to that particular observed in infancy. Simply put, regarding the 60% regarding people categorized Waco hookup site by themselves as safer (part B), from the 20% demonstrated by themselves as the avoidant (part A great), and you can on 20% explained themselves as the anxious-unwilling (part C).
(With techniques, new Hazan and you may Shaver measure presumed which to be true.) Then studies have searched which theory in lots of ways. Like, Kelly Brennan and her associates accumulated many comments (e.grams., “I think you to definitely anyone else would be there in my situation once i you need them”) and analyzed how these comments “hang together” mathematically (Brennan, Clark, Razor, 1998). Brennan’s conclusions recommended there are one or two basic proportions with respect to help you adult attachment models (come across Contour 2). You to definitely critical varying might have been branded attachment-related anxiety. People who rating high on that it variable often care whether or not their companion is obtainable, receptive, conscious, etcetera. People that get towards the lower end associated with varying are safer about imagined responsiveness of its couples. Additional important changeable is known as attachment-related avoidance. Some one for the top of the range of the dimensions choose never to have confidence in someone else otherwise open up to others. Individuals for the reasonable avoid with the dimension be more safe getting intimate with people and so are better depending upon and you will with other people depend upon her or him. An excellent prototypical secure adult are low towards the those two proportions.
Brennan’s conclusions is actually critical due to the fact previous analyses of your own statistical patterning away from conclusion certainly children on unusual situation inform you a few functionally comparable dimensions: the one that captures variability regarding the nervousness and opposition of man plus one one to captures variability regarding the children’s readiness to use the moms and dad due to the fact a safe refuge getting assistance (pick Fraley Spieker, 2003a, 2003b). Functionally, these types of dimensions are much like the a couple of-dimensions uncovered certainly people, recommending one to similar patterns regarding connection occur during the more situations when you look at the living.
Birutės g. 2, LT-91203 Klaipėda
Tel. 8 46 381272
El. paštas: info@versloreklama.lt